Project Comparison - Unit 11 vs Unit 6

This page is the explicit evaluation that the assignment brief requires: the final individual project (Unit 11) compared against the initial team-project proposal (Unit 6). The evaluation is written from the position of having completed both, looking backward.

The comparison is one of the assessed components of the e-Portfolio: it carries weight under the Collaboration criterion of the rubric. It is also the single richest source of material for the Reflection page, because it makes the team-to-individual arc visible as a continuous thread rather than as two unrelated projects.

---

What the team project proposed (Unit 6)

(To be populated near the 8 June 2026 deadline. A faithful summary of the team’s stated business question, the proposed methodology, the planned scope, the team-level success criteria, and the constraints and assumptions captured in the submitted Unit 6 report.)

What the individual project delivered (Unit 11)

(To be populated near the 13 July 2026 deadline. A faithful summary of the individual deliverable: the focus chosen, the modelling decisions, the methodology actually applied, the findings, and the limitations.)

Where the two converge and where they diverge

(To be populated. The structured comparison: what carried over unchanged, what was deliberately narrowed, what was reframed in light of what the team work produced, and what the individual project added that the team work did not.)

What this comparison taught me

(To be populated. The lessons that only become visible when you look at the two side by side. This section feeds directly into the Reflection page; phrasing here can be reused there subject to the 1,000-word cap on the final reflective piece.)

References

Inline references appear within each section above as content is added. The consolidated list lives on the References page.